AC Active learners
1 24 targeted
Reporting & analytics
The reports assessment administrators expect to see.
RFPs do not stop at delivery. QFlowLearn connects operations signals, item metadata, state standards, attempt evidence, scoring, accommodations, and exports so administrators can explain what happened and where learners need support.
Performance analytics
Delivery and outcome signals
Assessment operations, learner performance, and recovery risk for a sample reporting demo.
AV Average score
70.8% 18 scored
CO Completion rate
87.5% 21 of 24 submitted
CE Certification ready
9 >= 70% threshold
Score distribution
Distribution of finalized learner percentages.
Item engagement
Answered share across submitted attempts.
Opening Warmup 18 answered, 0 skipped
85.7% Declaration Era 18 answered, 0 skipped
85.7% Union and Emancipation 18 answered, 0 skipped
85.7% Conservation Legacy 18 answered, 0 skipped
85.7% New Deal Leadership 18 answered, 0 skipped
85.7% Delivery health
Operational signals from receipts, scoring, exports, and remediations.
Receipt path 21 Durable submissions
Needs action 3 Scoring queue
Stable 0 Export queue
Open work 0 Recovery work
Recovery risk
Attempts needing scoring, export, or remediation attention.
Scoring failed Urban assessment demo
Scoring queued Taylor assessment demo
Scoring queued Sage assessment demo
Individual learner performance
Sorted by scoring risk and performance threshold.
| Learner | Status | Score | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|
| Urban Failed urban-failed@demo.qflowlearn.local | failed | Not scored | Scoring issue |
| Sage Queued sage-queued@demo.qflowlearn.local | queued | Not scored | Scoring queue |
| Winter Not Started winter-not-started@demo.qflowlearn.local | not started | Not scored | Not started |
| Quinn Complete quinn-complete@demo.qflowlearn.local | complete | 100% | Ready |
| Oakley Advanced oakley-advanced@demo.qflowlearn.local | complete | 91.7% | Ready |
RFP reporting coverage
Analytics that answer common procurement questions.
Buyers usually ask whether the platform can show standards mastery, diagnose item quality, compare cohorts, document accommodations, and export data for downstream systems. These are first-class report categories in the QFlowLearn packet.
Delivery operations
Track active learners, submission receipts, scoring queue, export queue, recovery work, and attempts that need attention.
State standards mastery
Break results down by state framework, domain, standard code, assessment form, class, cohort, subgroup, and learner.
Item engagement and quality
Show answered share, skipped items, p-value, discrimination, response distribution, distractor signals, scoring corrections, and review flags.
Role-specific reports
Separate administrator operations, instructor views, learner reports, family summaries, registrar exports, and curriculum reports.
Export center
Download report catalogs, data dictionaries, assessment result bundles, learner bundles, and CSV exports with spreadsheet formula hardening.
Report matrix
What belongs in an RFP packet.
Each report needs a redacted sample, export format, data dictionary, and current status. QFlowLearn now includes an export center with catalogs, dictionaries, result bundles, learner bundles, item analysis exports, standards mastery exports, and CSV artifacts for downstream review.
| Report | Reviewer | Packet artifact | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Delivery and outcome signals | Assessment operations, support teams | Active attempts, completion, score distribution, item engagement, recovery risk | In build for launch |
| State standards mastery report | Assessment directors, curriculum teams | Standards/domain charts, CSV export, redacted PDF sample | Ready |
| Item analysis and distractor report | Psychometrics, item authors | Answered, skipped, average score, p-value, discrimination, response distribution, distractor signals, timing, amendments, and review flags | Ready |
| Cohort and subgroup breakdown | Program owners, compliance teams | Group comparisons, accommodation filters, trend export | Planned |
| Individual learner report | Instructors, registrars, learners | Score, standard-level evidence, accommodation record | In build for launch |
| Family report | Families, advisors, learner support teams | Plain-language score summary, strengths, next steps, translated copy target | In build for launch |
| CSV / SIS export | Registrars, data teams | Roster, item analysis, standards mastery, learner rows, evidence rows, attempts CSV, and OneRoster provisioning run reports | Ready |
| Result export bundle | Registrars, data teams, technical evaluators | ZIP bundle with manifest, roster, item analysis, item results, evidence, score history, standards mastery, and data dictionary | Ready |
| Learner report bundle | Instructors, registrars, learner support teams | ZIP bundle with learner report JSON, item rows, evidence rows, attempt rows, score history, manifest, and dictionary | Ready |
| Export catalog and data dictionary | Data teams, procurement, technical evaluators | Artifact catalog, column definitions, lineage, sensitivity labels, row counts, and manifest hashes | Ready |
| QTI results export | Interoperability reviewers | QTI-aligned result evidence where required by procurement | Planned |
State standards
Show the exact standards map the institution cares about.
QFlowLearn should not flatten standards into a generic objective list. Item metadata can preserve the framework, code, hierarchy, source, and review status so reports can match the state or district structure in the RFP.
The examples here are representative reporting families. The packet should use the buyer's actual state framework, district standards, or competency map.
TEKS Texas state standards
Domain, reporting category, standard code
B.E.S.T. Florida state standards
Benchmark, domain, assessment form
Common Core Multi-state adoption
Grade, strand, cluster, standard
NGSS Science standards
Performance expectation, practice, crosscutting concept
SOL Virginia state standards
Subject, strand, standard code
Custom district map Local standards or competencies
Imported code, label, hierarchy, owner
Procurement details
Reports need governance, not just charts.
Real assessment RFPs ask who can see reports, when reports are released, how data is exported, how corrected scores are handled, and whether families or learners get a readable version. The analytics story should answer those questions directly.
- Printable and downloadable report samples for evaluators who cannot access a live demo.
- Data dictionary for every export field, including learner, roster, standard, item, score, receipt, evidence, and accommodation columns.
- ZIP bundles for assessment-level results and individual learner reports, each with a manifest, row counts, and artifact hashes.
- Spreadsheet formula neutralization in CSV exports so downloaded data is safer to open in common office tools.
- Role visibility matrix for administrators, teachers, students, families, registrars, and support teams.
- Release controls for embargoed reports, corrected scores, rescoring updates, and family-facing publication.
Reporting evidence
Add analytics samples and export bundles to the procurement packet.
The RFP packet should include redacted standards mastery, item analysis, subgroup, individual learner, data dictionary, result bundle, and learner bundle samples so evaluators can see the reporting story directly.